All Gippsland's forests (native forests in parks and state forest, plantations and farm trees) are cared for appreciated because people are better informed and actively engaging in dialogue about their future.
To provide safe places for all Gippsland people to converse about forests, increase mutual understanding and explore and identify solutions to forest issues and challenges
Supporting dialogues will increase mutual understanding, reduce conflict and improve leadership on forest matters

We are working to build trust through discussion, shared learning and approaching forest management issues from every point of view.
The point of using dummy text for your paragraph is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters. making it look like readable English.
The Gippsland Forest Dialogue aims to build understanding and agreement among stakeholders around the opportunities, challenges and knowledge gaps related to [the management and lack of management of] forests in Gippsland.
The Dialogue creates a space for diverse stakeholders to come together to talk about how best to look after the region’s forests, for people and planet, and to explore, agree on and facilitate collaborative actions that bring about these positive changes.
The Dialogue is independent and local. We have no government funding, no preconceived decisions or agendas and no collective association with peak bodies, interest groups, political parties or movements. We do not favour the interests of one group or sector and all options and opportunities are on the table. We want to learn from the lessons of the past and try to succeed where previous attempts have failed.
Our international partner - The Forests Dialogue - has facilitated more than 90 dialogues on contentious issues in forest management across the globe over the past 20 years. These are normally multi-stakeholder engagements over 1-4 days with a mix of field visits, presentations and facilitated discussions, working to identify common areas of agreement and disagreement (fracture-lines), discuss and hopefully break deadlocks and create real, meaningful change by giving participants the mandate to determine outputs and outcomes.